>Hear Bruno Gollnisch Speak on Freedom of Speech and Saving our European Heritage

In the darkest essence of an Orwellian “Thought Crime,” EU Parliamentarian Bruno Gollnisch has been prosecuted and threatened with prison for simply saying in a private conversation with a journalist that he leaves it up to historians to debate the Holocaust. Dr. Gollnisch did not in any way deny the Holocaust or historical crimes against Jews and he specifically said that there were obviously terrible crimes against the Jews in the war, but as far as numbers go, he simply said that he leaves it up to the historians to debate and decide the issue. So, now in France one can be prosecuted not only for stating an politically incorrect idea about an historical event of over half a century ago, one can go to prison for simply saying you don’t know enough about the subject and deferring the question to experts.

You must not only not question the dogma, but every time the subject comes up you must proclaim clearly your belief in it, or face imprisonment for simply inferring that you might somewhere in your heart of hearts dare to doubt the new religion of our times.

Never has suppression of freedom of thought and conscience sunk to such lows. Listen to this gripping David Duke interview with a brilliant former professor of Law, fluent in French, German, Japanese and English. Gollnisch speaks about the immigration threat, and threat to freedom posed by globalism. He also discusses fully the terrible repression of free speech in Europe that rampant at the same time media complains of free speech issues in Tibet and China. The EU Parliament, he says, has passed resolutions condemning the destruction of ancient people and culture of Tibet while at the same time promotes almost identical policies threatening European heritage! –David Duke

Contact Dr. Bruno Gollnisch with your comments and compliments on the interview. bgol(at)orange.fr   [you must type in this address with @ to your email address box]

Turning the Tables on the Israel-Firsters

By Michael Scheuer

Now that the dust has settled in the spat between journalist Joe Klein and the ideologues at Commentary, it is time to regret the ink spilled over the non-issue of “dual loyalties.” The idea that there are U.S. citizens who have equal loyalties to the United States and Israel is passé. American Israel-firsters have long since dropped any pretense of loyalty to the United States and its genuine national interests. They have moved brazenly into the Israel first, last, and always camp. Sen. Joseph Lieberman, Norman Podhoretz, Victor Davis Hanson, the Rev. Franklin Graham, Alan Dershowitz, Rudy Giuliani, Douglas Feith, the Rev. Rod Parsley, Paul Wolfowitz, James Woolsey, Bill Kristol, the Rev. John Hagee, and the thousands of wealthy supporters of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) appear to care about the United States only so far as Washington is willing to provide immense, unending funding and the lives of young U.S. service personnel to protect Israel. These individuals and their all-for-Israel journals – Commentary, National Review, the Weekly Standard, and the Wall Street Journal – amount to nothing less than a fifth column intent on involving 300 million Americans in other peoples’ religious wars, making them pay and bleed to protect a nation in which the United States has no genuine national security interest at stake.

The Israel-firsters’ success is, of course, the stuff of which legends are made. Most recently, for example, we heard President Bush echo Sen. Lieberman’s insane and subversive contention that the United States has a “duty” to ensure the fulfilling of God’s millennia-old promise to Abraham regarding the creation and survival of Israel. Bush told the Knesset all Americans are ready to endlessly bleed and pay to ensure Israel’s security. And where does the president derive authority to make such a commitment in the name of his countrymen? From the Constitution? On the basis of America’s dominant religion? From – heaven forbid – a thoughtful, hardheaded analysis of U.S. interests?

No, Bush’s pledge was based on none of these. Bush’s decision to more deeply involve America in the eternal Arab-Israeli war was based on nothing less than the corruption wrought on the American political system by the Israel-firsters, AIPAC’s enormous treasury, and the lamentable but growing influence of America’s leading evangelical Protestant preachers.

The Israel-firsters started the Iraq war and now have the United States locked into an occupation of that country that may not end in any of our lifetimes. Unless Americans ignore the likes of Hanson, Podhoretz, Lieberman, Woolsey, and Wolfowitz, the cost in blood and treasure will ultimately bankrupt America.

 
Continue at AntiWar.com

Here is a disturbing collection of Youtubes that expose AIPAC one of the most infamous Jewish organizations that make up the Israel Lobby:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y8pnWCNEPA

——————–
2 of 5 (more…)

This is it! This article is the best I have read concerning the Zionist influence and power over the foreign policy of the United States. Among many important points, it completely blows away the “War for Oil” lies surrounding the Iraq War and the planned Iran War. For instance it shows how although Iran has huge untapped supplies and oil and gas, which American-based oil companies would love to develop, present Jewish Neocon policy makes it illegal for them to enter agreements with Iran, completely against the economic interests of the oil companies. It also points that so-called big oil had absolutely no direct lobbying effort for the Iraq War, while the Jewish Extremists had nonstop agitation for the war both on lobbying and media level. Every intelligent person in the United States and around the world needs to read this article, study it and think about it. As America and the world tightens sanctions against Iran and continues to commit acts of war (such as embargoes) against that country, everyone must consider the human and economic catastrophe of this new war planned for Israel.  One more point, Petras also exposes how the leading so-called liberals who dismiss the power of the Jewish Lobby and use the “War for Oil” argument, happen to be Jews (such as Chomsky). Coincidence? Those who claim Big Oil is the culprit in effect shield the real power behind these policies and war that are catastrophic to America and the world.  –Dr. David Duke

 Israel’s War with Iran and the Zionist Power Configuration in America

Zionists and their allies in Congress authored, implemented and enforced sanctions against Iran, which hinder the ambitions of the world’s biggest oil and gas companies

By Dr. James Petras

“My strong preference here is to handle all this (US conflict with Iran) diplomatically with the other powers of government, ours and many others as opposed to any kind of strike occurring… From the US perspective, from the United States military perspective in particular, opening up a third front (Israeli and/or US act of war against Iran) would be extremely stressful to us”
Testimony of Admiral Michael Mulligan, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. July 2, 2008.

“If Iran continues its nuclear arms program – we will attack it. The sanctions aren’t effective. There will be no choice but to attack Iran to halt the Iranian nuclear program.”
Shaul Mofaz, Israeli Minister of Transportation in Yediot Ahronot , June 6, 2008.

“The present economic sanctions on Iran have exhausted themselves. Iranian businesspeople who would not be able to land anywhere in the world would pressure the regime.”
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, speaking to US House Speaker, Senator Nancy Pelosi in favor of a unilateral, pre-emptive US naval blockade of Iran. (Haaretz May 21, 2008.)

“It was a triumphalist conference. Even this powerful organization (AIPAC), the most powerful group in the US Israel lobby, had never seen anything like. Seven thousand Jewish functionaries from all over the United States came together to accept the obeisance of the entire Washington elite. The three presidential hopefuls (Hillary went too) made speeches, trying to outdo each other in flattery. Three hundred senators and members of Congress crowded the hallways. Everybody who wanted to be elected or re-elected to any office came to see and be seen.”
Uri Avnery, London Review of Books, July 3, 2008. page 18

House Resolution 362 received unanimous support from all the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations including the 7,000 delegation attending the AIPAC Conference in Washington DC on June 2-4, 2008.

“Resolution 362 became our chief legislative priority”, according to AIPAC’s website, June 4, 2008.

“The President should prohibit the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products imposing stringent inspection requirements in all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains and cargo ships enters and departing Iran.”
US House Resolution 362 introduced May 22, 2008.

Resolution 362 gained 170 co-sponsors or nearly 40% of the House and 19 co-sponsors in the Senate in less than a month.

Introduction

Zionists and their allies in Congress authored, implemented and enforced sanctions against Iran, which hinder the ambitions of the world’s biggest oil and gas companies. Israeli war exercises and public declarations threatening a massive air assault on Iran has pushed petroleum prices to world records. This spring 2008, the most powerful pro-Israel Jewish Lobby in the US, AIPAC held their annual conference and secured the support and commitment of both major US Presidential candidates and the majority of US members of Congress for an Israeli initiative to impose extreme economic sanctions on Iran with threats of a US/Israeli military attack. (more…)

Heretical Two Seek Political Asylum in U.S.

The pair fled a thought crime prosecution in Britain for offending non-Whites.

By Jeff Davis – EURO

The Yorkshire Post tells the story: “Two men convicted of publishing race-hate” [i.e. racially truthful] “articles on the internet have skipped bail and fled to the United States to claim political asylum…Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle were given bail by a judge at Leeds Crown Court on Friday, despite having been found guilty of a series of race-related offences. The pair were due to return to court on Monday while a jury continued deliberating over further charges, but they failed to show up… Last night Sheppard, 51, and Whittle, 41, were being held by immigration officials at Los Angeles Airport outside the jurisdiction of the British court system. It is believed that the pair travelled from the UK to Ireland by ferry before taking a direct flight to Los Angeles. They are likely to have their case considered at an immigration hearing in the US before UK authorities can secure their return.”

There’s just one little problem with White men trying to use political asylum laws: These laws are not meant to protect REAL victims of political persecution, especially pro-White activists, who speak the truth about racial differences or the Holocaust.

US political asylum laws are meant to allow in a flood of Chinese coolies, Haitian boat people and every imaginable Third World race, who are all making false political asylum claims. That’s how political asylum laws work in the US (and various nations of Europe). After making a false asylum claim, the illegal immigrant is released pending a hearing, usually with some kind of temporary visa that allows him every privilege native-born Americans have, including the right to work legally. Many of these invaders are coached by liberal activist groups in what stories to tell to the immigration authorities and the sympathetic media, and how to tell them.

(more…)

Audio Version MP3!

Save America and the world from another catastrophic war for Israel in the Mideast!

Before America goes to war against Iran, subjects thousands of Iranians and Americans to death or harm, spends billions of American dollars, skyrockets oil to over 300 dollars a barrel and over $10 a gallon, and plunges America and the world into depression and rampant terrorism, here are a few good questions! –David Duke

Which country in the Middle East actually possesses nuclear weapons?

Israel.

Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?

Israel.

Which country in the Middle East refuses to allow international inspections of its nuclear facilities?

Israel.

Which countries in the Middle East have called for the region to be a nuclear-free zone?

The Arab countries and Iran.

Which country in the Middle East occupies land belonging to other people?

Israel, which occupies a piece of Lebanon, a larger piece of Syria, East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.

Which country in the Middle East has for 60 years refused to allow refugees to return to their homes and refused to consider compensation to them for their lost property? (more…)

Two Pro-Enforcement Democratic Incumbents Handily Defeat Primary Challenges

By Roy Beck

We have good results from Primary elections for two Democratic incumbent congressmen who bucked their Party leadership on immigration. Both faced vigorous Primary challenges from candidates backed by Democrats who said the incumbents were too centrist. We are well aware that Democrats who stand for reduced immigration levels will do better in the General elections, but we are particularly gratified to see that standing for sensible immigration also is a good political sell in Democratic Primaries.

And in the other Party, the Republican freshman who has earned the second best immigration grade of the entire 535-Member Congress beat back a Primary challenge from his District’s Party and business establishment. (More on Paul Broun below.)

SAVE Act Hero, Rep. Barrow, Wins In Georgia

I was especially excited to see Rep. John Barrow (D-Ga.) win his Savannah District Primary. Having narrowly been elected to Congress in 2004, he had immediately established himself on immigration issues as a friend of the common working man and woman and the middle-class taxpayers.

He has earned the 11th best immigration-reduction grade among all Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Barrow is one of only a dozen Democrats brave enough to buck House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and sign the Discharge Petition to force a vote on the SAVE Act (sponsored by another freshman Democrat Heath Shuler of North Carolina).

At a NumbersUSA event this spring, Barrow gave a stirring speech about the importance of standing up for true Democratic Party values in protecting the most vulnerable workers in society. He said if the Democratic leadership won’t stand for the principles of protecting American workers from unfair foreign labor importation, he will always be willing to oppose his Party for the sake of the voters of his District.

 
Continue at NumbersUSA

Hear David Duke’s Speech at EURO-RUS!

Click on title for the audio mp3 or see video below!

On June 27 and 28 Patriots from Europe, America and Russia gathered in Dendermonde Belgium at the EURO-RUS International Conference.  Russia has been one of the few nations of the European World to dare to stand up to the Jewish-extremist Neocons who dominate American policy. They oppose Russia today because it has dared to prosecute the criminal oligarchs of Russia and because Russia does not go along with the Neocon Israel-subservient policy. Jewish-supremacist power in media has embarked on a vicious anti-Russian campaign that must be countered by European-American patriots. In this stirring speech, David Duke outlines some of the critical issues facing European mankind and gives us an understanding why Russia faces attacks from the Zionist-influenced press. Kris Roman (on left) hosted the successful conference and will give a full report of the conference soon on DavidDuke.com. The Keynote Speaker for the conference was our own David Duke and his powerful speech on  strategies for winning the struggle ahead will be featured soon! [David’s 2nd day speech HERE, videos from EuroRus & more photos below!]

 
(If anyone has the capability of posting David’s inspiring EuroRus speech onto Youtube please have at it! - TIA)
http://www.davidduke.com/mp3/dukespeechateurorus1.avi (more…)

Barack Obama welcomes guests at the annual White Pride Convention - (Just Kidding)

By Jason Robb

I thought that would grab your attention. It’s almost funny to think that Barack Obama would actually attend and seek support or encourage White pride at any White Nationalist meeting. Well, why not, he received a warm welcome from the annual NAACP convention Monday night, and just recently spoke at the National Conference of La Raza (which means the Race), the national Mexican group that is attempting to break the Western states from the United States and reclaim it for Mexico. It is an organization that doesn’t want any border security on our Mexican border, a policy that would have dire consequences for America. McCain as well spoke at La Raza and is planning to speak at the NAACP convention this coming Wednesday. It seems that both of these Senators are actively trying to seek support from Mexicans, African Americans, Homosexuals, Chinese, Vietnamese, Indians, Mongs, Eskimos, Aborigines, etc. Hopefully, I haven’t left any group out. Oh, what about the Whites? They are no big deal. As you can tell, I’m hoping to show the irony here that “mainstream” candidates are trying to seek support from every group imaginable except the whites, the biggest racial group in the United States. Seems kind of crazy doesn’t it?  You don’t see these senators speaking at Council of Conservative Citizens or the Euro Conference with David Duke and Don Black. Why? Because they don’t care about the unique and precious culture of White-Europeans. They don’t care if it is destroyed. If they did, they would be making statements about it. Either way, Whites lose in November on election day. No matter who wins, this election will make it clear to White Americans that they must now support an uncompromising Movement for our European American Heritage and Freedom.

Source: Jason Robb Esq.

85 year old Paul Henss and his wife receive the news that they will uprooted from their country and family and be deported because as a twenty-one-year-old during the Second World War in the German military, he worked at a concentration camp and trained dogs. This while war criminals Bush and Blair, responsible for the death of over a million people in war based on lies, are honored by nations around the world!

Little Crimes Get Punished, Big Ones Don’t

War Crimes Paradox

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

National Public Radio has been spending much news time on Darfur in Western Sudan where a great deal of human suffering and death are occurring. The military conflict has been brought on in part by climate change, according to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. Drought is forcing nomads in search of water into areas occupied by other claimants. No doubt the conflict is tribal and racial as well. The entire catastrophe is overseen by a government with few resources other than bullets.

Now an International Criminal Court prosecutor wants to bring charges against Sudan’s president, Omar al-Bashir, for crimes against humanity and war crimes.

I have no sympathy for people who make others suffer. Nevertheless, I wonder at the International Criminal Court’s pick from the assortment of war criminals? Why al-Bashir?

Is it because Sudan is a powerless state, and the International Criminal Court hasn’t the courage to name George W. Bush and Tony Blair as war criminals?

Bush and Blair’s crimes against humanity in Iraq and Afghanistan dwarf, at least in the number of deaths and displaced persons, the terrible situation in Darfur. The highest estimate of Dar fur casualties is 400,000, one-third the number of Iraqis who have died as a result of Bush’s invasion. Moreover, the conflict in the Sudan is an internal one, whereas Bush illegally invaded two foreign countries, war crimes under the Nuremberg Standard. Bush’s war crimes were enabled by the political leaders of the UK, Spain, Canada, and Australia. The leaders of every member of the “coalition of the willing to commit war crimes” are candidates for the dock. (more…)

Popular radio talkshow host Dino Costa does a no-holds-barred interview with David Duke. Dino Costa disagrees with Dr. David Duke on a number of issues but he believes in freedom of speech and is courageous enough to let people judge for themselves the ideas and opinions of one of the world’s best known controversial political figures.

Hear Dino Costa Interview Dr. David Duke

Some people are quite surprised (and skeptical) at the information that Dr. Duke discusses. Everything he says is well-documented and proven. Here are some links to subjects David Duke covers in the program so you can verify their authenticity for yourself.

*  The Black Liberation Theology of Obama’s Church

*  Prof. Nathan Abrams’  (Jewish Professor) article, “Triple xxxthnics” — How Jewish pornographers are motivated by atavistic hatred of White Christians

*  How Jewish organizations have been the driving force behind the immigration invasion

*  37,460 White women victims of Black male rape or sexual assault in 2005 — less than 10 Black female victims of White rape or sexual assault

*  The new film Greta, promoting White teenage girls to date Black men, even with criminal records!

*  “Not Jewish enough to marry a Cohen,” How the Israeli government forbids Jewish Cohanim from marrying religious Jews who possess even a trace of Gentile blood in their genetic ancestry

Hear David Duke’s Broadcast on “The Death of a White Girl” or Download

Jana Shearer:
The Defilement and Death
of a White Girl

How Life Imitates Film

By David Duke

In Tyler Texas a pretty, young White woman, Jana Shearer, 21, met and started dating a Black man by the name of Christopher McCuin. She didn’t worry about the fact that he was a multiple felon or that he was Black, for during her entire life the media taught her that dating Blacks is a very desirable thing, even a fashionable thing to do, and like most young White girls today, she was saturated with the idea that resisting the social and sexual advances of Black males was tantamount to the greatest sin, that of racism. She gave into these converging forces and now she is dead.

With her natural defenses stripped away, the innocent girl was easy prey for the street wise McCuin. Ultimately, Jana paid for her media-induced naivety with her life, even her very flesh. To quote the Associated Press on January 9, 2008:

TYLER, Texas (AP) January 9, 2008 — A man killed his girlfriend, then filleted and cooked parts of her body before calling police to tell them what he was doing, authorities said Sunday.

Christopher Lee McCuin, 25, called 911 on Saturday and told an emergency dispatcher he had killed Jana Shearer, 21, and was boiling her body parts at his mother’s home, said Smith County Sheriff J.B. Smith.

When authorities arrived at the home, they found Shearer’s mutilated body, one ear boiling in a pot of water on the stove and a fork sticking out of some human flesh sitting on a plate on the kitchen table.

Before the long campaign of Hollywood movies and TV production to make race-mixing fashionable, quiet and decent young southern girls in Texas would not have considered having a relationship with a Black man, much less one with a criminal record. That was the time when love for your heritage, and loyalty to it was something carried, as they say, from generation to generation in the mother’s milk.

(more…)

Rev. Ted Pike of truthtellers.org

Hear David Duke’s Radio Broadcast Interview of Rev. Ted Pike: “How Hate Crime Laws Are Used to Advance the World’s Most Hateful Creed”

Obama preaching before his church of twenty years, a church that says it is true not to America, but to Africa, and one that publicly says it is founded on principles of a book dedicated to “the destruction of the White enemy.”

Obama’s Church dedicated to “the destruction of the White Enemy”

“black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.”

The Washington Times has just released a story showing that Obama’s church publicly declares that its ministry is founded on a book that proposes “the destruction of the white enemy.” Here are some excerpts from the article:

By S.A. Miller, Washington Times
April 1, 2008

The church where Sen. Barack Obama has worshiped for two decades publicly declares that its ministry is founded on a 1960s book that espouses “the destruction of the white enemy.”

Trinity United Church of Christ’s Web site says its teachings are based on the black liberation theology of James H. Cone and his 1969 book “Black Theology and Black Power.”

“What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love,” Mr. Cone wrote in the book.

Mr. Cone, a professor at the Union Theological Seminary in New York, added that “black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.”

…Mr. Obama has been a member of Trinity, on Chicago’s South Side, since finding religion there 20 years ago under Mr. Wright’s mentorship. Mr. Wright married the Obamas and baptized their children, and a sermon of his inspired Mr. Obama to title his book “The Audacity of Hope.”

Here are some more of the words of James Cone in Black Theology and Black Power.

Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community

… Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.

Of course, Obama and his professional campaign staff say that he does not share the explicit views expressed by his church and mentor, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Jr. The question is, of course, how could he not share them? These core views of Obama’s church are plastered all over its website, often repeated in its literature, and have been expounded on by Rev. Wright hundreds of times in public and private right in front of Barack Hussein Obama. Obama’s wife in her own senior thesis at Princeton said that rather than being dedicated to humanity, or even to America, that she is dedicated to the Black community first. Early in the campaign, Michelle Obama let the cat out of the bag when she said that in her entire adult life she had never felt any pride in America until Obama found popular support in the primaries. Learning about the American revolution, our Constitution and Bill of Rights, or even about Americans making the first footsteps on the moon couldn’t make Michelle Obama feel any pride in America, only her husband’s political success as a Black man could do that.

I am convinced that Barack Hussein Obama’s real views are exactly those that have been publicly declared by his church and his mentor for 20 years: “the destruction of the White enemy.” The most shocking thing about these revelations is not that Obama has these views, for they are shared by millions of other non-Whites and millions more Mexican illegals who seek Reconquista over the “White enemy” in America. The shocking thing is that the media and the political establishment give Obama a free pass for his anti-White racism and associations. What clearer evidence of America’s political sickness could there be than having a major candidate for President of the United States who is a leading member of a church that in its primary mission statement says it is true not to America, but to Africa?  –David Duke

With Don Black being out of town this past week there have been no recent Storm-Radio programs to listen to, luckily we have an interesting video broadcast with Dr. Duke to hold us over courtesy of Dr. Alfred Vierling! Here is part III of Alfred’s interview series titled ‘Europe: Between Americanisation and Islamisation’ featuring David Duke which was recently taped at the Euro-Rus convention. We have been updating our Euro-Rus page with some more photos that you can check out here also be sure to visit Alfred’s excellent website here. — admin